John Kerry Served in
Viet Nam and I thank him for his service there. He came back and Viet Nam
Anti-war movement and I don't
feel he honored the Solders
that came after and went before him in Nam. Now John Kerry is bring up the
war again because he doesn't
want to talk about his
vote record in the senate. Could it be that he is not on the side of the Military?
I could never vote for a man that
will not let the
Military defend The U.S. with the proper armament.
He voted
to kill the Bradley Fighting Vehicle
He voted to kill the M-1 Abrams Tank
He voted to kill every Aircraft carrier laid down from 1988
He voted to kill the Aegis anti aircraft system
He voted to Kill the F-15 strike eagle
He voted to Kill the Block 60 F-16
He voted to Kill the P-3 Orion upgrade
He voted to Kill the B-1
He voted to Kill the B-2
He voted to Kill the Patriot anti Missile system
He voted to Kill the FA-18
He voted to Kill the B-2
He voted to Kill the F117
In short, he voted to kill every military appropriation for the development and
deployment of every weapons systems since 1988 to include the battle armor for
our troops. With Kerry as president our Army will be made up of naked men
running around with sticks and clubs.
He also
voted to kill all anti terrorism activities of every agency of the U.S.
Government and to cut the funding of the FBI by 60%, to cut
the funding for the CIA by 80%, and cut the funding for the NSA by 80%.
Senator John Kerry (D-MA) has voted for:
·
Authorization for use of force against Iraq (2002, Iraq War - Op.
Iraqi Freedom)
·
Homeland Security Act of 2002 (Dept. of H.S.)
·
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2001
·
Motion to dismiss impeachment of Clinton (motion failed,
nonbinding vote)
·
Authorization for air operations & missile strikes against
Yugoslavia (Serbia)
·
Welfare reform
·
NAFTA
·
Resolution supporting Pres. George H.W. Bush's actions against
Iraq in Gulf War
Kerry has voted against:
·
Supplemental funding for Iraq/Afganistan military &
humanitarian efforts (2003)
·
Medicare Prescription Drug & Modernization Act of 2003
·
Partial Birth Abortion Act of 2003
·
Jobs and Growth Tax Act of 2003
·
Job Creation and Worker Assistance Act of 2002
·
Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001
·
Motion to table (kill) use of force authorization in Kosovo
·
Clinton obstruction of justice charge
·
Clinton perjury charge
·
Defense of Marriage Act
·
Authorization for use of force against Iraq (1990, Gulf War - Op.
Desert Storm)
Zell's Right, Kerry's Wrong
by Joseph A. D'Agostino
Posted Sep 10, 2004
Ever since Democratic Sen. Zell Miller of Georgia delivered his scorching speech
at the Republican National Convention attacking John Kerry's record on defense
issues, Kerry's partisans, including those in the liberal media, have been
frantically laboring to discredit Miller.
They have done everything from claiming that Miller lied to slanderously
implying that the same man they lionized in 1992, when he gave the keynote
address at the Democratic National Convention, is really a closet racist.
What they haven't done is present the relevant facts. So, what are those facts?
The passage in Miller's speech that elicited the most vehement denials from the
Kerryites simply listed the weapons systems Miller said Kerry opposed.
No Response
"Listing all the weapons systems that Sen. Kerry tried his best to shut
down sounds like an auctioneer selling off our national security but Americans
need to know the facts," said Miller. "The B-1 bomber that Sen. Kerry
opposed dropped 40% of the bombs in the first six months of Operation Enduring
Freedom. The B-2 bomber that Sen. Kerry opposed delivered air strikes against
the Taliban in Afghanistan and Hussein's command post in Iraq. The F-14A Tomcats
that Sen. Kerry opposed shot down Khadafi's Libyan MIGs over the Gulf of Sidra.
The modernized F-14D that Sen. Kerry opposed delivered missile strikes against
Tora Bora. The Apache helicopter that Sen. Kerry opposed took out those
Republican Guard tanks in Kuwait in the Gulf War. The F-15 Eagles that Senator
Kerry opposed flew cover over our Nation's Capital and this very city after
9/11.
"I could go on and on and on," said Miller. "Against the Patriot
missile that shot down Saddam Hussein's SCUD missiles over Israel. Against the
Aegis air-defense cruiser. Against the Strategic Defense Initiative. Against the
Trident missile."
Are there sources that back up Miller's claims here? Yes. Kerry's own campaign
literature and voting record.
- When Kerry first ran for the Senate in 1984, he published a campaign
document in which he promised to try to cancel "this year" all
the weapons systems that Miller mentioned in his speech except the B-2
bomber and Trident missile.
- Kerry voted to cancel the B-2 bomber on Aug. 2, 1990 (roll call vote #208)
and on Sept. 18, 1992 (roll call vote #216).
- Kerry voted on Aug. 11, 1995, to cancel funding for the Trident II nuclear
missile for submarines (roll call vote #393).
In a June 19, 2003, article in the Boston Globe, Kerry--now a
wartime presidential candidate--admitted he had opposed the very weapons
systems Zell Miller cited him for opposing. In this article, Kerry admitted
some of his positions on weapons had been "ill-advised" and
"stupid." But he still defended his opposition to some other
weapons systems.
"In his zeal to keep pace with [1984 Democratic primary opponent James]
Shannon's leftward drift on disarmament," the Globe reported,
"Kerry supported cancellation of a host of weapons systems that have
become the basis of U.S. military might--the high-tech munitions and
delivery systems on display to the world as they leveled the Iraqi regime of
Saddam Hussein in a matter of weeks. These weapons became conversation
topics at American dinner tables during the Iraq war, but candidate Kerry in
1984 said he would have voted to cancel many of them: the B-1 bomber, B-2
stealth bomber, AH-64 Apache helicopter, Patriot missile, the F-15, F-14A
and F-14D jets, the AV-8B Harrier jet, the Aegis air-defense cruiser, and
the Trident missile system.
"He also advocated reductions in many other systems, such as the M1
Abrams tank, the Bradley Fighting Vehicle, the Tomahawk cruise missile, and
the F-16 jet," the Globe continued. "In retrospect, Kerry
said some of his positions in those days were 'ill-advised, and I think some
of them are stupid in the context of the world we find ourselves in right
now and the things that I've learned since then.' But he defended his
opposition at the time to the MX missile, the 'Star Wars' strategic defense
initiative, and some other programs."
The conclusion is irrefutable: Had Kerry actually succeeded in canceling the
weapons systems he promised to fight to cancel when he was first elected to
the Senate--or that he later specifically voted against in the Senate--every
one of the weapons Miller listed Kerry as opposing would have been
cancelled. The systems that in the words of the liberal Boston Globe
became "the basis of U.S. military might" would not have been
built.
Ironically, it is Kerry's supporters who now want people to believe
Kerry flip-flopped and actually supported the weapons he was elected vowing
to oppose. Further, they argue that Kerry cannot be accused of
"voting" against specific weapons systems merely because he
sometimes voted against overall Defense authorizations or appropriations.
Yet, this argument, implies that Kerry should not be credited for supporting
specific weapons merely because he sometimes voted for overall Defense
authorizations or appropriations.
Interestingly enough, Kerry did vote for the Defense bill in 1985, his first
year in the Senate. By the logic of Kerry's current supporters, that would
mean he immediately betrayed his campaign pledges of 1984 and supported the
very weapons systems he had just been elected opposing. Then, again, Kerry
voted against the Defense authorization and appropriations bills in 1990 and
1995, and the Defense authorization in 1996.
So, when should Kerry get credit for flip-flopping and abandoning the
campaign promises that made him a senator? HUMAN EVENTS last week repeatedly
asked the Kerry campaign if they could cite any instance between
Kerry's 1984 campaign and 2003 interview with the Boston Globe in
which Kerry ever expressly said he had changed his mind and now supported
any of the weapons systems Miller listed in his Republican convention
speech.
The Kerry campaign took the question. But no one ever responded.