|
JOHN "SCARY" KERRY If security in more important to you to you then your FREEDOM Scary Kerry is just who your looking for.
|
"Benedict Arnold was a war hero, wounded in battle -- before he turned against his country. Hitler was likewise a decorated and wounded veteran of the First World War. Being a war hero is not a lifetime "get out of jail free" card, exempting you from responsibility for what you do thereafter." -Thomas Sowell- |
|
This is John Kerry telling the Senate what crappy country he forced to live. Nothing better then a rich wife to take care of you when you are trying to not pay tax by moving you boat to a more friendly state. Where is Joe Biden to explain to John that it is un-American to not to pay your fair share. (Click here for information on Viet Nam Veterans not for John Kerry)
|
In 1968 the Viet Cong started the Tet Offensive campaign. The North Vietnamese lost the battle and would have surrendered if it had not been for the U.S. press and anti-war protesters. I feel that the war protesters prolonged the war causing more losses of American Solders lives. There is a definition of giving aid and comfort to the enemy and I want to know if it is being naive or outright treason? (Click here for information on Tet |
|
|
JOHN KERRY CAUGHT IN A NEW LIE ... MAKE THAT LIES This is going to be a common theme throughout this election, and the Bush campaign needs to seize on this right away. Not only does the Democratic nominee for president switch positions as he sees fit, but Senator John Kerry just tells outright lies. That's right; when the truth doesn't suit his purpose, he just concocts something that does. Do you think the mainstream media would let a Republican get away with something like that? Of course not. Today's tall tale centers on none other than the brutal communist dictator 90 miles off the Florida coast, Cuban President Fidel Castro. While pandering for Hispanic votes in Sunday's Miami Herald, Kerry said "I'm pretty tough on Castro, because I think he's running one of the last vestiges of a Stalinist secret police government in the world. And I voted for the Helms-Burton legislation to be tough on companies that deal with him" Sounds like pretty much the same thing as President Bush, right? Well, the newspaper did a little digging, and once again, Kerry's past comes back to haunt him. It turns out that Senator John Kerry actually voted against the Helms-Burton legislation. Never let the facts get in the way of good campaigning, right? Let's just see if the media calls Kerry out on this one at his next press conference. I doubt it. Oh ... and while we're at it. Yet another Kerry lie. This one is about that continuing brouhaha over Kerry's statement that he met with foreign leaders who told him that they wanted him to beat Bush. Kerry's statement was recorded --- yes, recorded --- by a Boston Globe reporter handling pool coverage. Well ... this is turning into a problem for Kerry for two reasons. First, nobody seems to remember when he has met with any foreign leaders. Second, he refuses to share with us the names of these foreign leaders he's been talking too. Now it seems that Kerry wants to change his story. At a recent meeting with campaign donors Kerry was challenged about his statement that he had met with these mysterious foreign leaders. Kerry's response? "I never said that. What I said was that I have heard from people who are leaders elsewhere in the world who don't appreciate the Bush administration approach and would love to see a change in the leadership of the United States." Seems like Mr. Kerry has a problem! Here's this tape recording where Kerry clearly says "met," and there's Kerry saying "I never said that!" By the way ... just in case you've missed this important fact about John Kerry ... I'll just let this cartoon say it for him:
AND THIS IS WHY JOHN SKERRY VOTED AGAINST SUPPORT FOR OUR TROOPS? sKerry seems to be having a rough time 'splaining his no-vote on continuing funding for our troops in Iraq. He's now telling people that he would have voted for the $87 billion funding measure, but decided not to because Bush wouldn't raise taxes on the rich to pay for it. Wow! A presidential candidate saying "If you're not going to raise taxes on rich people, then I'm not going to vote to give our troops what then need in Iraq. So there." The question is: Which is more important to John Kerry. Supporting our troops in Iraq, or raising taxes on the rich? We now know the answer. THE FRENCH LOVE KERRY This should come as no surprise, since John Kerry and the French share the same anti-American, pro-terrorist agenda. It is a bit of a surprise just how popular he is over there. Apparently, Kerry's face is all over magazines and newspapers on the newsstands of Paris. This quote from a Frenchman says it best: "He is the closest thing that you will have to a French politician, with a certain diplomacy, a certain elegance." He must mean a certain elegance with supporting terrorist regimes sympathetic to Al-Qaeda. He is right about one thing, though. Kerry does look French. It's a good thing the French can't vote in American elections.
|
|
Jane Fonda seated at anti-aircraft gun in North Vietnam, 1972. These guns were used to shoot down American airplanes and to kill American pilots and aircrew.
|
KEEP TALKING, HANOI JANE ... JUST KEEP TALKING.
If there is anything that John Kerry does not want following him through this election it's the idea that he had anything to do with Jane Fonda. Fact is, he did. Kerry and Fonda were fellow travelers on the anti-war circuit throughout the country. If you listen to the show you will know that I don't toss the word "treason" around lightly. Over the past few years I've had callers call various protestors to our actions in Iraq traitors, and in all cases I've made it clear that I disagree. People must be free to protest the actions of our government in this country without being branded traitors ... whether we agree with them or not. Jane Fonda? Now there was a traitor. She traveled to North Vietnam during a time of war. She posed on the very anti-aircraft batteries that the North Vietnamese used to shoot down American aircraft. She posed there wearing a helmet and flashing big smiles to the very people who had been trying to kill our American pilots. Former prisoners of war tell stories of being tortured if they refused to appear in photo ops with Fonda. It is my firm belief that Jane Fonda is directly responsible for the deaths of many American servicemen in Vietnam. She is directly responsible for wives having to go on without their husbands, and children growing up without their father. I can still hear Fonda saying "Socialism ... it's the only way." I guess that was before she earned millions with her workout videos. Jane Fonda was a friend of the enemy, and an enemy of the United States. She richly earned and deserves to this day the enmity of the people of the United States. And she was a woman with whom John Kerry had no problems appearing with in his anti-war cause. Jane Fonda should have been tried, prosecuted and convicted of treason. She should still be serving time in a federal prison today. She is despised by mainstream America. Deservedly so. So ... keep at it, Hanoi Jane. The heartland of this country knows who you are, and they know what you did. They know that there are American servicemen who never came home because of your actions. Give your cell phone number to CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, CNBC and the rest of the news outlets out there. Let them know that you're ready at any time to appear and stand up for John Kerry. Make yourself a leech on his backside. Let all of American know how proud you are of this man and what a great president he will be. Americans who truly love freedom, and recognize that the blood of true patriots will sometimes be shed in its defense, will thank you. John Kerry will not. Article from Neal Boortz web site.
|
The Heinz Endowments: By Tom Randall
CHICAGO - Pittsburgh is home to a new liberal funding organization
that lists its priorities as the local environment, land use and
"sustainability." However, its affiliations raise questions
about its real purpose.
What makes the pairing with Tides troubling is that organization's secretive funneling of cash from private foundations -- such as Heinz, the Pew Charitable Trusts and many others -- to extreme left-wing activist groups whose interests include exclusion of humans from both public and private lands, anti-war protests, opposition to free trade, banning of firearms, abolition of the death penalty, unlimited abortion rights, gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender advocacy, as well as and environmental extremism.
How it's done
Tides works like this: When a high-profile donor wants to give money to a group with an extreme agenda but doesn't want its fingerprints on the donation, it simply gives the money to The Tides Foundation in the form of a "donor- advised donation." Tides then passes that money on to the desired recipient, masking the real source of the cash. As anti-war activist Drummond Pike (who set up the Tides Foundation in 1976 for the express purpose of keeping donors' identities unknown) told the Chronicle of Philanthropy, a publication for the nonprofit world, "Anonymity is very important to most of the people we work with."
And, the amount of "hidden money" handled by the Tides Foundation is considerable. Since its founding, the relatively little-known foundation has made over $300 million in grants. In 2002 it amassed assets of $139 million and had an income of $59.3 million. Between 1995 and 2001, $4.3 million of that money came from the Howard Heinz Endowment. In 2002, it and the Vira Heinz Endowment blessed The Tides Center, a San Francisco spin-off of the Tides Foundation, with another $190,000 while the two endowments gave $1.6 million to the new Tides Center for Western Pennsylvania. If all this movement of money between the Tides Foundation, Tides Center, two Heinz Endowments and Pittsburgh's new Tides Center for Western Pennsylvania has you shaking your head, let's talk about your money. You, the taxpayer.
Public underwriting
Nearly $8 million in taxpayer money flowed into the Tides Center in the form of federal grants made by eight different agencies between 1997 and 2001. They include the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Energy. Does this mean your tax dollars also are going to fund the Tides Center for Western Pennsylvania, a creation of the Howard Heinz Endowment, which in 2001 was worth a breathtaking $788.6 million in 2001? With the Tides Center for a partner, we will likely never know. What we do know is that, with Tides as a partner, the Heinz Endowments now keep interesting company.
Friends of Heinz
The Tides Center also manages the Youth Gender Project whose goal is to "empower and support transgender, gender-variant, intersexed and gender-questioning youth and young adults." I freely admit, not all of these terms are in my spell-checker. Grant recipients also include the Iraq Peace Fund that has so far granted $489,000 to 27 groups to promote anti-war marches and their coverage by the news media, as well as the mission of one of those groups, MoveOn.org, whose purpose is to defeat George W. Bush.
While groups such as these and dozens of others organized and/or financed by the Tides Foundation and Center are relatively recent in their origin and transient in their nature, many are more established and pervasive in their influence. The Ruckus Society, which received over $200,000 in Tides money between 1999 and 2002, was begun in 1995 to train activists in violent protest against biotechnology, globalization and the World Bank. It incited property destruction in the Seattle riots of 1999 and Washington, D.C., the following year. However, Ruckus director John Sellers didn't see the wanton destruction of property as being violent at all. He told Mother Jones magazine, " I make a distinction between violence and destruction of property. Violence to me is against living things. But inanimate objects? I think you can be destructive, you can use vandalism strategically. It may be violence under the law but I just don't think it's violence."
The Natural Resources Defense Council, another Tides project, destroyed many apple farmers in Washington state with its phony Alar pesticide scare. It "leaked" a false report that Alar, used by the state's apple growers there, caused cancer, particularly in children. Even movie stars signed onto the hoax, testifying before Congress about Alar's dangers. Sales of apples plummeted before the hoax could be debunked.
Finally, the American Medical Association concluded, "The Alar scare of three years ago shows what can happen when science is taken out of context or the risks of a product are blown out of proportion." Unfortunately, that conclusion came too late to save the livelihoods of many growers.
Unfortunately, too, it came too late to prevent NRDC from cashing in to the tune of $700,000 from a book on the bogus scare.
But that seems to be what Tides and its dozens of its related organizations are about: money, a flagrant disregard for the truth, and even disdain for the law.
Those capitalistic old American entrepreneurs Howard and Vira must be spinning in their graves.
Tom Randall is a senior partner with the consulting firm
Winningreen LLC. A longer version of this commentary was published by
Capital Research Center and is available at www.capitalresearch.org
|